🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – seems like demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what the typical American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to workers' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances is that we take a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.