🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that could add as many as five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's block that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in detailing its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had instructed the state to employ the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling is part of a national fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, Democratic representatives decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A top House leader argued the court had yet again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.