🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is navigating a challenging course since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed three times they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in some form if negotiations reopen.

The US president last week said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust difficult to restore.

Diplomacy Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the primary resolution to address disagreements, but its criteria, regulations and principles must be respected."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a reply in the same language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."