Trump States Peace Plan Is Not 'Final Offer' as Representatives Convene for Swiss Talks
Ex-leader Donald Trump remarked on Saturday that his Russian-prepared proposal for peace constituted "not my final offer", after strong reaction from Ukraine's officials and commentators that likened it to a Munich pact of 1938 involving Chamberlain and Hitler.
During brief comments from the White House, the US president informed journalists: "We’d like to get to peace. This should have occurred earlier … we are attempting to conclude it, in any case it must be resolved."
Forthcoming Switzerland Negotiations Involve Various Nations
Ukrainian and American delegates are scheduled to meet in Geneva this Sunday to discuss the plan. Security officials from France, Britain and Germany will also participate in these negotiations in Geneva.
Ahead of the talks, US senators informed the press that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland for clarification on the details of the leaked plan. According to him, the proposal did not originate from the administration but instead reflected Russian desires, as reported by Senator King, who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Confronts Crucial Deadline
Nevertheless, the former president has given Zelenskyy until Thursday for signing the 28-point document. The document requires Kyiv to give up land under its control to Moscow, reduce its military forces, and relinquish long-range weapons. Additionally, it rules out international peacekeepers and penalties for Russian war crimes.
In a sombre speech on Friday, the Ukrainian leader cautioned that Ukraine faces an impossible choice over the coming days involving preserving its national dignity and forfeiting a major partner in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine is experiencing one of the most difficult moments in its history.
Ukrainian Dialogue Delegation Formed for Geneva Talks
In comments this weekend, Zelenskyy emphasized that genuine or respectable peace was always based on assured safety and fairness. He announced a negotiating team, appointed through a decree, which will meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, led by top aide Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate of the Ukrainian delegation, former defence minister and security council official Rustem Umerov, stated there would be discussions with the US regarding potential terms for a peace deal.
Suggesting limits, he noted: Ukraine enters these talks with defined goals. This is another stage of the dialogue that has been ongoing in recent days and is primarily aimed at aligning our vision for the next steps."
Global Response and Criticism
The Ukrainian president has sought to engage constructively with the US administration seemingly determined to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has made clear that he will not surrender Ukraine’s sovereignty or disregard a constitution that protects the country’s current borders.
During a summit in South Africa, G20 leaders and EU representatives issued a joint statement pushing back on Trump’s plan, saying it requires "additional work". The statement indicated that members of the EU and NATO must be involved on some of its provisions, which rule out Kyiv’s Nato membership and put conditions on its future EU accession.
Citizen Views in Kyiv
Ukrainian reaction to the text, drawn up by a Russian representative and a US delegate, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Analysts said it was a blueprint for further Russian aggression: not only of Ukraine but of other parts of Europe too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in Ukraine’s 2014 pro-democracy Maidan revolution, said it drew comparisons with the Munich Agreement. The proposal belonged to the same "recognisable genre", where the affected party is asked to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
In a Facebook post, he said he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended people who had hidden in basements in Bucha or Mariupol – where Russian troops executed hundreds of civilians – and families of deported children to Russia. A deeply cynical deal, he stated.
In an interview in Kyiv’s Golden Gate metro station, Sariskyi, 21, said that Russia has attempted to dominate Ukraine over many years. The agreement offered very little in the proposed deal and maintained its forces on Ukrainian soil. "I think the deal is an attempt to break Ukraine and force unjust conditions on us," he said.
Should Ukraine accept the terms Kyiv would be forced to give up its freedoms, he added. If rejected, the US would most likely break off cooperation and intelligence sharing, a vital resource of military intelligence for Ukraine's forces. "There is no good way out of this for now," he remarked.
Diverse Perspectives from the Public
A different commuter, 19-year-old Barchan, said that Ukraine would "keep strong" without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Crimea and the eastern regions are part of Ukraine. It belongs to Ukraine." She expressed that the president is intelligent and predicted he would not cede territory.
While speaking during rainfall, near a historical monument, Ivanovna mentioned her appreciation to the former US leader for his attempts to broker peace. She said that Ukraine should be ready to give away Crimea and the eastern Donbas region temporarily if it ensured keeping America as a partner. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she proposed.
European Officials Condemn the Plan
Previous European leaders have strongly criticized the plan. Finland’s former prime minister Marin called it a catastrophe, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for "all of the democratic world". She said if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – further hostilities could arise.
Belgium's ex-PM, Verhofstadt, referenced a statement by Churchill of an appeaser as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He added: "Trump now takes Putin’s side. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."